I am deeply concerned with proposed increase regulation and oversight of leveraged and inverse funds. I have spent years reviewing and learning about leveraged funds, watched their performance and understand their risks. With careful measures, I have had success using them to increase my portfolio considering in excess of the market (eg SPY). And have steps to cover losses in bear markets. To add more hurdles, regulations, tests and other barriers to public investments comes across as onerous and heavy handed, and runs counter to the concept of our public accessible, publicly traded markets to grow wealth.
Carl Peters Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
I am deeply concerned with proposed increase regulation and oversight of leveraged and inverse funds. I have spent years reviewing and learning about leveraged funds, watched their performance and understand their risks. With careful measures, I have had success using them to increase my portfolio considering in excess of the market (eg SPY). And have steps to cover losses in bear markets. To add more hurdles, regulations, tests and other barriers to public investments comes across as onerous and heavy handed, and runs counter to the concept of our public accessible, publicly traded markets to grow wealth.