Leveraged funds can be very useful for certain goals. There is nothing necessarily optimal about the 1x leverage an investor would obtain using a typical index fund such as SPY. For some investors/situations, less than 1x leverage is better and for others, greater than 1x leverage is better. Hence restricting the public's access to leveraged funds could be detrimental to those whose risk/reward calculations point them towards greater than 1x leverage.
Furthermore, holding a smaller percentage of a portfolio in a leveraged product could allow an investor to hold a larger percentage in cash, which in turn could allow them to more comfortably weather an extreme market drawdown. For example, an investor comfortable with greater market risk might seek to have a portfolio with 40% allocated to a 3x leveraged fund and 60% in cash. This gives the investor 1.2x total leverage while preventing losses greater than 40%.
Another point is that restricting access to leveraged ETFs could lead to more retail investors trading more complex products like options in order to attain the leverage that they deem appropriate for their portfolio. This would be an unnecessary extra layer of complexity and could also potentially mean these investors will have to pay more commissions to trade the options than if they were investing in ETFs (which typically have no fees these days).
Overall, having access to leveraged products allows investors to create individualized portfolios tailoring to their specific risk appetites. It would be a loss to restrict the usage of these products.
For the Public
FINRA DATA
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
FINPRO
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
FINRA GATEWAY
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
For Case Participants
DR PORTAL
Arbitration and mediation case participants and FINRA neutrals can view case information and submit documents through this Dispute Resolution Portal.
Need Help? | Check System Status
Log In to other FINRA systems
Ajay Balaji Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
Leveraged funds can be very useful for certain goals. There is nothing necessarily optimal about the 1x leverage an investor would obtain using a typical index fund such as SPY. For some investors/situations, less than 1x leverage is better and for others, greater than 1x leverage is better. Hence restricting the public's access to leveraged funds could be detrimental to those whose risk/reward calculations point them towards greater than 1x leverage.
Furthermore, holding a smaller percentage of a portfolio in a leveraged product could allow an investor to hold a larger percentage in cash, which in turn could allow them to more comfortably weather an extreme market drawdown. For example, an investor comfortable with greater market risk might seek to have a portfolio with 40% allocated to a 3x leveraged fund and 60% in cash. This gives the investor 1.2x total leverage while preventing losses greater than 40%.
Another point is that restricting access to leveraged ETFs could lead to more retail investors trading more complex products like options in order to attain the leverage that they deem appropriate for their portfolio. This would be an unnecessary extra layer of complexity and could also potentially mean these investors will have to pay more commissions to trade the options than if they were investing in ETFs (which typically have no fees these days).
Overall, having access to leveraged products allows investors to create individualized portfolios tailoring to their specific risk appetites. It would be a loss to restrict the usage of these products.