FINRA Requests Comment on Proposed Amendments to Its Gifts, Gratuities and Non-Cash Compensation Rules
Gifts, Gratuities and Non-Cash Compensation Rules
Regulatory Notice | |
Notice Type Request for Comment |
Referenced Rules & Notices FINRA Rule 2310 FINRA Rule 2320 FINRA Rule 3220 FINRA Rule 3221 FINRA Rule 3222 FINRA Rule 5110 NASD Rule 2830 Notice to Members 06-69 |
Suggested Routing Compliance Investment Companies Legal Registered Representatives Senior Management Variable Contracts |
Key Topics Business Entertainment Commercial Bribery Gifts Gratuities Non-Cash Compensation |
Executive Summary
FINRA is seeking comment on proposed amendments to FINRA Rule 3220 (Influencing or Rewarding Employees of Others), as well as on proposed FINRA Rule 3221 (Restrictions on Non-Cash Compensation), and proposed FINRA Rule 3222 (Business Entertainment).
The proposed rule text is available in Attachment A.
Questions concerning this Notice should be directed to:
Action Requested
FINRA encourages all interested parties to comment on the proposal. Comments must be received by September 23, 2016.
Comments must be submitted through one of the following methods:
Marcia E. Asquith
Office of the Corporate Secretary
FINRA
1735 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1506
To help FINRA process comments more efficiently, persons should use only one method to comment on the proposal.
Important Notes: All comments received in response to this Notice will be made available to the public on the FINRA website. In general, FINRA will post comments as they are received.1
Before becoming effective, a proposed rule change must be authorized for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by the FINRA Board of Governors, and then must be filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEA).2
Background & Discussion
In April 2014, FINRA launched a retrospective review of its gifts, gratuities and non-cash compensation rules to assess their effectiveness and efficiency. In December 2014, FINRA published a report on its review.3 The report concluded that while the rules have met their intended investor protection objectives, they could benefit from some updating to better align the investor protection benefits and the economic impacts. To that end, FINRA recommended exploring a combination of proposed rule amendments and guidance.
As discussed further below, FINRA is proposing amendments to the gifts, gratuities and non-cash compensation rules to, among other things: (1) consolidate the rules under a single rule series in the FINRA rulebook; (2) increase the gift limit from $100 to $175 per person per year and include a de minimis threshold below which firms would not have to keep records of gifts given or received; (3) amend the non-cash compensation rules to cover all securities products, rather than only direct participation programs (DPPs), variable insurance contracts, investment company securities and public offerings of securities; and (4) incorporate existing guidance and interpretive letters into the rules.
In addition, FINRA is proposing a revised approach to internal sales contests for non-cash compensation such that if payment or reimbursement of expenses associated with the non-cash compensation arrangement is preconditioned on achievement of a sales target, the non-cash compensation arrangement must: (1) be based on the total production with respect to all securities products; and (2) not be based on conditions that would encourage an associated person to recommend particular securities or categories of securities.
Finally, FINRA is proposing to incorporate into the amended rules a principles-based standard for business entertainment that would require firms to adopt written policies and supervisory procedures for business entertainment.
Proposed Rule Amendments
FINRA Rule 3220 (Influencing or Rewarding Employees of Others)4 (the Gifts Rule) prohibits any member or person associated with a member, directly or indirectly, from giving anything of value in excess of $100 per year to any person where such payment is in relation to the business of the recipient's employer. The rule also requires members to keep separate records regarding gifts and gratuities.5 The rule seeks both to avoid improprieties that may arise when a member firm or its associated persons give anything of value to an employee of a customer or counterparty and to preserve an employee's duty to act in the best interests of that customer.
FINRA proposes to increase the gift limit from $100 to $175 per person per year.6 FINRA believes that an increase in the gift limit to $175 is appropriate because it takes into account the rate of inflation since adoption of the $100 gift limit.7
In 2006, FINRA issued Notice to Members (NTM) 06-69 addressing gifts and business entertainment to clarify the gifts that are subject to the Gifts Rule; that members must aggregate all gifts given by the firm and its associated persons to a particular recipient over the course of a year; the manner by which to value gifts; and the supervision and recordkeeping requirements for gifts.8 In addition, over the years, in response to inquiries regarding the Gifts Rule, the staff has issued various interpretive letters, including a letter regarding the application of the Gifts Rule to bereavement gifts.9
FINRA proposes to incorporate, without material change, the guidance in NTM 06-69 as well as its interpretation regarding the application of the Gifts Rule to bereavement gifts into FINRA Rule 3220 as Supplementary Material. Thus, the Supplementary Material would provide that: (1) there is no express exclusion from the Gifts Rule for gifts given during the course of business entertainment, unless the gift is of de minimis value, or a promotional or commemorative item; (2) gifts must be valued at the higher of cost or market value;10 (3) members must aggregate all gifts given by the member and each associated person of the member to a particular recipient over the course of the year; (4) bereavement gifts that are customary and reasonable are not considered to be in relation to the business of the recipient and, therefore, are not subject to the restrictions of the Gifts Rule or its recordkeeping requirements; (5) gifts given for infrequent life events (e.g., a wedding gift or congratulatory gift for the birth of a child) are not subject to the restrictions of the Gifts Rule or its recordkeeping requirements provided the gifts are customary and reasonable, personal in nature and not in relation to the business of the employer of the recipient; and (6) gifts of a de minimis value, promotional items of nominal value and commemorative items are not subject to the restrictions of the Gifts Rule or its recordkeeping requirements provided they meet the conditions specified in the Supplementary Material.11 In addition, FINRA proposes to incorporate into the Supplementary Material to FINRA Rule 3220 the guidance in NTM 06-69 regarding supervision and recordkeeping requirements for gifts.
FINRA and NASD rules generally prohibit members and their associated persons from directly or indirectly accepting or making payments or offers of non-cash compensation in connection with the sale of variable insurance contracts,12 investment company securities,13 DPPs14 and the public offerings of debt and equity securities.15 These prohibitions are subject to specified exceptions that permit:
FINRA believes that the general prohibitions regarding the payment or receipt of non-cash compensation should be extended beyond investment company securities, variable insurance contracts, DPPs and public offerings of securities as the conflicts underlying these prohibitions exist with respect to all securities. Accordingly, FINRA proposes to eliminate the existing non-cash compensation rules and replace them with proposed FINRA Rule 3221, which would apply to the payment or receipt of non-cash compensation in connection with the sale of any security. Specifically, proposed FINRA Rule 3221(b) would provide that "No member or person associated with a member shall directly or indirectly accept or make payments or offers of payments of any non-cash compensation in connection with the sale of securities." This prohibition would be subject to the exceptions discussed below.
Consistent with the existing non-cash compensation rules, the proposal would except from the prohibitions on non-cash compensation arrangements gifts from offerors17 that do not exceed a specified threshold per individual per year and are not preconditioned on the achievement of a sales target.
The proposal would define the term "preconditioned on the achievement of a sales target" as describing a non-cash compensation arrangement in which an offeror or member communicates in advance that an associated person will receive non-cash compensation only if the associated person achieves either a dollar-denominated goal for selling securities or a goal of finishing within a defined number of top sellers of securities.18 As with the dollar threshold under the proposed amendments to the Gifts Rule, FINRA proposes to limit the gifts exception under proposed FINRA Rule 3221 to $175.
The proposal would permit an offeror to make payments or reimbursements of associated persons' expenses in connection with a training or education meeting held by an offeror or a member, provided that the meeting meets the following conditions:
The existing non-cash compensation rules permit non-cash compensation arrangements between a member and its associated persons or a non-member company and its sales personnel who are associated persons of an affiliated member, provided that: (1) the member's or non-member's non-cash compensation arrangement, if it includes variable contract securities or investment company securities, is based on the total production of associated persons with respect to all variable contract securities or investment company securities, as applicable, distributed by the member; (2) the non-cash compensation arrangement requires that the credit received for each variable contract security or investment company security, as applicable, is equally weighted; (3) no unaffiliated non-member company or other unaffiliated member directly or indirectly participates in the member's or non-member's organization of a permissible non-cash compensation arrangement; and (4) the recordkeeping requirement relating to member compensation is satisfied.20
FINRA proposes to continue to permit non-cash compensation arrangements between a member and its associated persons or a non-member company and its sales personnel who are associated persons of an affiliated member if payment or reimbursement of expenses associated with the non-cash compensation arrangement is not preconditioned on achievement of a sales target. If payment or reimbursement is preconditioned on achievement of a sales target, the non-cash compensation arrangement must: (1) be based on the total production of associated persons with respect to all securities distributed by the member; and (2) not be based on conditions that would encourage an associated person to recommend particular securities or categories of securities. In addition, no unaffiliated non-member company or other unaffiliated member may directly or indirectly participate in the member's or non-member's organization of a permissible non-cash compensation arrangement.21
Thus, the proposal would permit members to continue to pay non-cash compensation to their associated persons outside the context of an internal sales contest. For example, this provision would permit a member to send its associated persons to an internal training meeting that is not tied to achievement of a sales target. The meeting would not have to meet the same requirements as a training or education meeting sponsored by a third-party offeror, but no unaffiliated entity could participate in the organization of these types of arrangements.
Unlike the existing non-cash compensation rules, however, the proposal would not permit product-specific internal sales contests. FINRA believes that internal sales contests that favor one security (e.g., a proprietary investment company) or one type of security (e.g., investment companies or stocks) potentially create an incentive to engage in sales conduct contrary to the best interests of customers. Consequently, "stock of the day" and similar promotions would be impermissible under the proposal.
Although the proposed rule change relating to internal sales contests is a significant substantive change to the existing rules, FINRA's impression is that product-specific internal sales contests for non-cash compensation are not widely used today. Moreover, to the extent that firms engage in internal sales contests, FINRA believes that requiring payment or reimbursement to be based on the total production of associated persons with respect to all securities distributed by the member and not be based on conditions that would encourage an associated person to recommend particular securities or categories of securities would reduce the potential for conflicts of interest and risk of abuse.
FINRA proposes to incorporate into proposed FINRA Rule 3221 as Supplementary Material language similar to the language discussed above in connection with the proposed Supplementary Material to the Gifts Rule. Thus, the Supplementary Material would provide that: (1) there is no express exclusion from the restrictions in the non-cash compensation rule for gifts given during the course of business entertainment, unless the gift is of a de minimis value, or a promotional or commemorative item; (2) gifts must be valued at the higher of cost or market value;22 (3) members must aggregate all gifts given by the member and each associated person of the member to a particular recipient over the course of the year; (4) gifts given for infrequent life events (e.g., a wedding gift or congratulatory gift for the birth of a child) are not subject to the restrictions of the non-cash compensation rule or its recordkeeping requirements provided the gifts are customary and reasonable and personal in nature; and (5) gifts of a de minimis value, promotional items of nominal value and commemorative items are not subject to the restrictions of the non-cash compensation rule provided they meet the conditions specified in the Supplementary Material.23
In addition, FINRA proposes to incorporate into the Supplementary Material prior guidance it has provided regarding training or education meetings. Specifically, the Supplementary Material would provide that the proposed rule's training or education exception "must first and foremost be intended to provide training or education to an associated person. Any training must occupy substantially all of the work day. Payment or reimbursement for any related meals, lodging and transportation is permissible, but reimbursement or payment for outings (e.g., golf outings), tours, or other forms of entertainment while at the location for the purpose of training or education is impermissible."24
The proposal would require a member to retain records of all non-cash compensation provided or received by the member or its associated persons for arrangements permitted under the proposed rule. The records must include: the names of the offerors, non-members or other members making the non-cash compensation contribution; the names of associated persons receiving the non-cash compensation under the arrangements; the nature and value of non-cash compensation provided or received; the location of training or education meetings; and any other information that evidences compliance by the member and its associated persons with the rule.
The proposed recordkeeping requirements differ from the existing non-cash compensation rules' recordkeeping requirements in that the proposal would require members to retain records of non-cash compensation provided or received by a member or its associated person. The existing non-cash compensation rules require members to maintain records of non-cash compensation received by a member or its associated persons. FINRA believes it would be important for members to retain records of non-cash compensation provided and received to help ensure that members comply with the provisions of the non-cash compensation rule.
In 1999, FINRA staff issued an interpretive letter stating that the Gifts Rule does not prohibit "ordinary and usual business entertainment" (such as an occasional meal, sporting event, theater production or comparable entertainment event) provided that the entertainment "is neither so frequent nor so extensive as to raise any question of propriety."25 The 1999 letter noted that the interpretation was based, in part, on FINRA's rules governing non-cash compensation in connection with the offer and sale of investment company shares and variable annuities.
FINRA proposes to replace the business entertainment standard in the existing non-cash compensation rules and 1999 letter with proposed FINRA Rule 3222, which would require each member to adopt written policies and supervisory procedures relating to business entertainment tailored to its business needs.26 The proposed rule would explicitly address the content of those policies and procedures and would incorporate elements of the business entertainment standard in the existing non-cash compensation rules and the 1999 letter. Specifically, proposed FINRA Rule 3222 would require that each member's written policies and supervisory procedures: (1) are designed to detect and prevent business entertainment that is intended as, or could reasonably be perceived as intended as, an improper quid pro quo; (2) define forms of permissible and impermissible business entertainment based on the location, nature, frequency and dollar amount of the business entertainment provided, as well as the type and dollar amount of any accommodations or transportation provided in connection with such business entertainment;27 (3) require that the offeror, member or one or more of the member's associated persons hosts the business entertainment; (4) specify that the business entertainment must not be preconditioned on the achievement of a sales target; and (5) require appropriate training and education of all personnel who supervise, administer or are subject to the written policies and supervisory procedures.
In addition, the proposed rule change would require that each member's written policies and supervisory procedures must require the maintenance of detailed records of business entertainment expenses, including the names of all persons providing and receiving business entertainment, the location, nature, frequency and dollar amount of the business entertainment, and the type and dollar amount of any accommodations or transportation provided.
Economic Impact Assessment
Regulatory Need
The assessment phase of FINRA's retrospective review of the gifts, gratuities and non-cash compensation rules concluded that these rules have been largely effective in meeting their intended investor protection objectives, but there are certain areas where the investor protection benefits may not align with the associated economic costs. For example, the views expressed by the stakeholders during the assessment suggested that a $100 gift limit is too low and that raising the limit would not undermine the purposes of the gifts and non-cash compensation rules. Stakeholders also raised concerns that the gifts, gratuities and non-cash compensation rules are scattered throughout the FINRA rulebook causing difficulties from a reference and compliance standpoint.
The amendments in this rule proposal are intended to address these current limitations and better align the investor protection benefits and the economic impacts.
Economic Impacts
The proposed amendments would directly impact member firms that regularly engage in gift giving and non-cash compensation arrangements. The proposed consolidation of the rules under a single rule series in the FINRA rulebook should simplify the supervisory efforts and could potentially lead to better use of compliance resources elsewhere within the firms. The increase in the gift limit from $100 to $175 per person per year reflects the rate of inflation since adoption of the $100 gift limit, and addresses the increase in not only the prices of goods, but also the shipping costs, taxes and other expenses. Furthermore, the inclusion of a de minimis threshold below which firms would not have to keep records of gifts given or received, and the exception regarding gifts related to specified life events—such as bereavement and wedding gifts, or gifts for the birth of a child—should reduce the costs associated with tracking and supervising such instances.
The proposal extends the general prohibitions regarding the payment or receipt of non-cash compensation in connection with the sale of investment company securities, variable insurance products, DPPs and public offerings of securities to the sale of all securities products. As mentioned above, such prohibitions on the payment or receipt of non-cash compensation are covered in several FINRA rules,28 so only firm activities that fall outside the scope of the current rules would be impacted by the proposed extension. FINRA identified that a potential area that would be impacted is private placements of securities. Between December 2012 and March 2016, there were 6,702 private placements facilitated by 750 FINRA member firms. While FINRA understands that, due to the nature of the private placements, accepting or making payments or offers of non-cash compensation is not a common industry practice, there may still be instances where the proposed rule may potentially apply.
The proposal also requires member firms to adopt written policies and supervisory procedures to maintain detailed records of business entertainment expenses. Member firms that have no relevant policies and supervisory procedures in place must dedicate compliance resources to recording and tracking such expenses. In the past several years, FINRA's examination staff has found instances of poor recordkeeping of such expenses. Specifically, the firms' logs that were used to record gifts and business entertainment did not indicate the recipient of each employee's expenditures or its intended business purpose. Member firms are expected to benefit from the reinforcement of more effective recordkeeping requirements. Moreover, the proposed rule would establish a principles-based standard that would allow firms to tailor their written policies and supervisory procedures to meet their business needs and to take a risk-based approach, so that they can allocate compliance resources to more significant issues.
FINRA also considered the potential impacts of the proposed amendments on investors. FINRA believes the proposed prohibition of product-specific internal sales contests, which typically favor one security or one type of security, reduces the potential for sales of products that are not aligned with the best interests of customers.
Request for Comment
FINRA requests comment on all aspects of the proposed rules, including any potential costs and burdens of the proposed rules. FINRA requests that commenters provide empirical data or other factual support for their comments wherever possible. FINRA particularly requests comment on the following questions:
1. FINRA will not edit personal identifying information, such as names or email addresses, from submissions. Persons should submit only information that they wish to make publicly available. See Notice to Members 03-73 (November 2003) (Online Availability of Comments) for more information.
2.See SEA Section 19 and rules thereunder. After a proposed rule change is filed with the SEC, the proposed rule change generally is published for public comment in the Federal Register. Certain limited types of proposed rule changes take effect upon filing with the SEC. See SEA Section 19(b)(3) and SEA Rule 19b-4.
3.See Retrospective Rule Review Report: Gifts, Gratuities and Non-Cash Compensation (December 2014).
4. In 2008, the SEC approved the transfer of NASD Rule 3060 into the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook without material change and renumbered the rule as FINRA Rule 3220.
5.See FINRA Rule 3220(c).
6. The current $100 gift limit has been in place since 1992, when the SEC approved an increase in the limit from $50 to $100. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31662 (December 28, 1992), 58 FR 370 (January 5, 1993) (Order Approving File No. SR-NASD-92-40). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21074 (June 20, 1984), 49 FR 26330 (June 27, 1984) (Order Approving File No. SR-NASD-84-8) (increasing the gift limit from $25 to $50).
7. FINRA staff used the annual rate of inflation data for the United States from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis website to estimate the change in consumer prices since 1992, when the SEC approved the increase in the limit from $50 to $100. The average rate of inflation over the 26 years is 2.34 percent and the compound increase in consumer prices over the period is 74.03 percent. Applying this increase to the $100 gift limit results in $174.03.
8.See NTM 06-69 (December 2006).
9.See letter from Gary L. Goldsholle, Vice President & Associate General Counsel, FINRA, to Amal Aly, Managing Director & Associate General Counsel, SIFMA, dated December 17, 2007 ("Aly Letter"). In 1999, the staff issued an interpretive letter stating that the Gifts Rule does not prohibit "ordinary and usual business entertainment" provided that the entertainment "is neither so frequent nor so extensive as to raise any question of propriety." That letter is discussed in more detail below in connection with proposed FINRA Rule 3222.
10. Tickets to sporting or other events would be valued at the higher of cost or face value.
11. In NTM 06-69, the staff stated that for a promotional item to be considered of nominal value its value must be substantially below $100. In addition, the staff did not specify in NTM 06-69 at what value it would consider a gift to be of de minimis value. Under the proposed rule change, FINRA proposes that gifts of de minimis value or promotional items of nominal value would not be subject to the restrictions of the Gifts Rule or its recordkeeping requirements provided that the value of the gift or promotional item is below $50. A firm or its associated persons may not engage in patterns of providing gifts or promotional items of less than $50 to circumvent the Gifts Rule's restrictions and recordkeeping requirements.
12.See FINRA Rule 2320(g)(4) (Variable Contracts of an Insurance Company).
13.See NASD Rule 2830(I)(B) (Investment Company Securities).
14.See FINRA Rule 2310(c) (Direct Participation Programs).
15.See FINRA Rule 5110(h) (Corporate Financing Rule—Underwriting Terms and Arrangements).
16.See NASD Rule 2830(I)(5) and FINRA Rule 2320(g)(4). FINRA Rules 5110 and 2310 do not require internal firm non-cash compensation arrangements in connection with public offerings of securities or direct participation programs to be based on total production and equal weighting of product sales.
17. The proposed definition of "offeror" is based on the current definitions of "offeror" in the existing non-cash compensation rules. Specifically, the proposal would define the term "offeror" to mean: "(A) with respect to the sale and distribution of variable contracts, an insurance company, a separate account of an insurance company, an investment company that funds a separate account, any adviser to a separate account of an insurance company or an investment company that funds a separate account, a fund administrator, an underwriter and any affiliated person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940) of such entities; (B) with respect to the sale and distribution of investment company securities not sold through variable contracts, an investment company, an adviser to an investment company, a fund administrator, an underwriter and any affiliated person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940) of such entities; and (C) with respect to the sale and distribution of any other type of security, an issuer, sponsor, an adviser to an issuer or sponsor, an underwriter and any affiliated person of such entities."
18. To fall with in this definition, a communication may be either explicit or implicit. Thus, an arrangement normally would not be considered preconditioned on the achievement of a sales target if a member or an offeror designates persons to participate in the arrangement in recognition of past sales, without stating the goal in advance. If, however, after several events, the selection criteria of the member or offeror becomes reasonably apparent, there may have been an implicit communication of a goal, and any similar arrangement in the future might be deemed preconditioned on the achievement of a sales target.
19.See, e.g., "Non-Cash Compensation—Training or Education Meetings," NASD Regulatory & Compliance Alert 13 (Summer 2000), (interpreting the training or education meeting exception in the existing non-cash compensation rules "as an event that is first and foremost intended to provide training or education to an associated person. Any training meeting should occupy substantially all of the work day."). FINRA subsequently published a letter reminding offerers that they may not pay for entertainment expenses of training or education meeting attendees. See letter from Mary L. Schapiro, President, NASD (March 7, 2001).
20. The total production and equal weighting requirements do not apply to arrangements involving DPPs or public offerings of securities.
21. Consistent with the existing non-cash compensation rules, the proposal would include a provision that would permit contributions by a non-member company or other member to a non-cash arrangement between a member and its associated persons, or contributions by a member to a non-cash compensation arrangement of a non-member, provided that it meets the requirements for such arrangements, including the total production standard.
22. As stated above, tickets to sporting or other events would be valued at the higher of cost or face value.
23. Consistent with the Gifts Rule, FINRA proposes a $50 de minimis threshold. In addition, the proposal would specify that gifts of de minimis value, promotional items of nominal value and commemorative items would not be subject to the proposed recordkeeping requirements relating to non-cash compensation arrangements.
24.See supra note 19.
25.See letter from R. Clark Hooper, Executive Vice President, NASD, to Henry H. Hopkins, Director, and Sarah McCafferty, Vice President, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., dated June 10, 1999 ("1999 letter").
26. FINRA proposes to include in Supplementary Material to proposed FINRA Rule 3222 language that makes clear that the purpose of the rule is to govern business entertainment provided by a member or its associated persons, as well as business entertainment accepted by a member or its associated persons from an offeror. In addition, the Supplementary Material would provide that business entertainment includes, but it not limited to, an occasional meal, a ticket to an event (e.g., sporting event) or theater and other comparable entertainment.
27. FINRA notes that a principles-based, rather than prescriptive, approach to what is permissible and impermissible business entertainment would satisfy this requirement of proposed Rule 3222.
28.See supra notes 12–15.
Attachment A
Below is the text of the amendments. New language is underlined; deletions are in brackets.
* * * * *
3220. Influencing or Rewarding Employees of Others
• • • Supplementary Material:-------------------
3221. Restrictions on Non-Cash Compensation
No member or person associated with a member shall directly or indirectly accept or make payments or offers of payments of any non-cash compensation in connection with the sale of securities, except the following:
A member shall retain records of all non-cash compensation provided or received by the member or its associated persons for arrangements permitted by paragraph (b) for the period specified by SEA Rule 17a-4. The records shall include: the names of the offerors, non-members or other members making the non-cash compensation contribution; the names of associated persons receiving the non-cash compensation under the arrangements; the nature and value of non-cash compensation provided or received; the location of training or education meetings; and any other information that evidences compliance by the member and its associated persons with paragraph (b).
• • • Supplementary Material: ------------------
3222. Business Entertainment
• • • Supplementary Material: ------------------
3223. Exemptions
Pursuant to the Rule 9600 Series, FINRA staff, for good cause shown after taking into consideration all relevant factors, may conditionally or unconditionally grant an exemption from any provision of the 3200 Series to the extent that such exemption is consistent with the purpose of the 3200 Series, the protection of investors, and the public interest.
Date | Commenter |
---|---|
Jim Biddle Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Matthew Rothchild Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Robert L. Hamman - Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Frederick T. Greene Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Tamara K. Salmon Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
John Hagberg Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
David T. Bellaire, Esq. Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Robert J. McCarthy Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Mike Nicholas Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Gary A. Sanders Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Pace University Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Fran Pollack-Matz Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
SIFMA Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
NASAA Comment On Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
ABA Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 | |
Anonymous Comment on Regulatory Notice 16-29 |