SEC Approves Amendments To NASD Membership Rules (Correction: On page 571, the 2nd sentence should read: "The updated information shall be prepared as of a date that is within 45 days before the interview." Online version amended)

Correction: On page 571, the second sentence under the subhead Updated Financial Information should read: "The updated information shall be prepared as of a date that is within 45 days before the interview." The online version of this Notice has been corrected.

INFORMATIONAL

Membership Rules

Effective Date: November 15, 2000

Executive Summary

On August 15, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved rule changes by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD^® or Association) that amend the Rule 1010 Series (Membership Rules or Rules) which governs the NASD membership application process. The amendments are designed to streamline and reorganize the current rules to make them more efficient for member firms and new applicants while preserving their investor protection function.

The amendments include the, following changes:

• adopting new definitions under Rule 1011 for "material change in business operations," "principal place of business," and "sales practice event";



• adopting Interpretive Material 1011-1, which creates a safe harbor for certain business expansions that are presumed not to be material changes and therefore do not require a firm to file an application pursuant to amended Rule 1017;



• simplifying administrative procedures for submitting an application and calculating the various applicable time limits;



• permitting the staff to immediately reject applications that are not substantially complete; and



• adopting new requirements for applicants to submit information concerning communications and operational systems to ensure business continuity.

In addition, current Rules 1017, "Removal or Modification of Business Restriction," and 1018, "Change in Ownership, Control or Operations," are consolidated into an amended Rule 1017.

Revisions also will be made to the reference documents, How To Become A Member Of The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and A Guide to Areas of Inquiry in Continuing Membership Applications and Applications to Remove or Modify Restrictions to conform them to the amended rules. Both revised documents will be found on the NASD Regulation, Inc. (NASD Regulation^SM) Web Site (www.nasdr.com) after the rule amendments become effective.

The rule changes are included with this Notice (see Attachment A). These changes become effective on November 15, 2000.

Questions/Further Information

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to Jeffrey S. Holik, Vice President and Director of Regulation Policy, Department of Member Regulation, NASD Regulation, at (202) 728-8387, or by e-mail at: [email protected]; Allison Reid, Membership Manager, Department of Member Regulation, NASD Regulation, at (202) 728- 6954, or by e-mail at: [email protected]; or Gregory Dean, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, NASD Regulation, at (202) 728-8159, or by e-mail at: [email protected].

Background

Beginning in August 1998, NASD Regulation staff worked with the Membership Admission Review Committee (Committee),¹ an adhoc committee convened to identify and recommend changes, if appropriate, to the Membership Rules in order to clarify and streamline the Rules while preserving their investor protection function. The Committee's recommendations were published in Notice to Members 99-67, "NASD Requests Comment On Proposed Amendments To Membership Rules" (August 1999).

Based upon comments received, the proposals were revised and submitted to the SEC. The SEC approved the publication of the proposals for comment on June 1, 2000.² On August 15, 2000, the SEC issued an order approving the proposed amendments to the Membership Rules.³

The most significant changes are as follows:

• reorganizing and consolidating some of the current rules to make them easier to use;



• clarifying the rules and policies for members' business expansions that are intended to provide more certainty to members regarding the types of expansions not requiring approval, while at the same time, preserving flexibility to allow NASD Regulation staff to review the more significant changes in members' businesses. This is achieved by:



• adopting a policy of building members' expansion plans into membership agreements;



• providing more guidance in the rules about the types of "material changes in business operations" that wil require a member to file a application for approval wit NASD Regulation; and



• providing a safe harbor for certain business expansions that will be presumed not to be material changes, and therefore, do not require members to file an application for approval;
• requiring applicants to submit information concerning communications and operational systems to ensure business continuity;



• simplifying administrative procedures for submitting an application and calculating the various applicable time limits that apply to the process;



• permitting the staff to reject immediately applications that are not substantially complete; and



• rescinding permanently the National Adjudicatory Council's (NAC) authority to review membership decisions that are not appealed by an applicant.

Below are the detailed explanations of the amendments.

Rule 1011 - Definitions

The definition of "Associated Person" is amended to clarify that it includes only natural persons.

The term "principal place of business" is defined for the first time. An applicant's principal place of business determines which NASD Regulation District Office (District Office) will process its application. "Principal place of business" means the location where the officers, partners, or managers direct and control the activities of the applicant, unless NASD Regulation staff designates a different location based upon where the largest number of associated persons are located or where the books and records are kept. This definition will provide more consistency and certainty regarding which District Office will process a firm's application.

NASD Regulation has redefined "sales practice violations" as "sales practice event." A sales practice event is one of the factors that NASD Regulation considers in determining whether an applicant satisfies the admission standard in Rule 1014(a)(3), which requires a showing that the applicant and its associated persons are capable of complying with, among other things, the federal securities laws and the Association rules. The new term is intended to encompass matters, including any customer complaint, arbitration, or civil litigation, that have been or are required to be reported to the Central Registration Depository (CRD^SM) or otherwise are required to be reported to NASD Regulation (e.g., via reports pursuant to Rule 3070).⁴ This change is in response to concerns that some items required to be reported to CRD or pursuant to Rule 3070 are not considered to be formal violations. While this change does not affect the existing review standards under Rule 1014, it does provide clarification to amended Rule 1014(a)(3)(B).

The terms "Applicant" and "Interested Association Staff" are also amended to conform them to other rule changes.

The term "material change in business operations" is beingdefined for the first time. The term is defined to include, but is not limited to, removing or modifying a membership agreement restriction;⁵ market making, underwriting, or acting as a dealer for the first time; or adding business activities that require a higher minimum net capital. All other expansions, including those categories of new business lines identified on Form BD, are to be evaluated on a facts and circumstances, case-by-case basis.

NASD Regulation does not believe that it is possible to develop a exhaustive definition of the term "material change in business operations."⁶ If a change in a member's business falls outside of the definition or the safe harbor provisions described below in Interpretive Material 1011-1 (IM- 1011-1) (e.g., because it exceeded the safe harbor limits or the member has disciplinary history), then the member must determine whether, based upon all facts and circumstances, the change is material. A member may, but is not required to, contact the District Office to obtain guidance on this issue. Ultimately, the member is responsible for compliance with amended Rule 1017. If the staff determines that the change is indeed material, then the member potentially could be subject to disciplinary action for failure to file an application under Rule 1017.

In instances when a member intends to add a line of business, staff experience has shown that this type of expansion is often a significant event that has an impact on the firm's supervisory and compliance infrastructure, personnel, and/or finances. When such an impact occurs, NASD Regulation staff is required under the rules to verify that the member continues to meet each of the membership criteria identified in Rule 1014.⁷ However, NASD Regulation recognizes that the characterization of any proposed new business line as a "material change in business operations" ultimately depends on an assessment of all relevant facts and circumstances, including:

• the nature of the proposed expansion;



• the relationship, if any, between the proposed new business line and the firm's existing business;



• the effect the proposed expansion is likely to have on the firm's capital;



• the qualifications and experience of the firm's personnel; and



• the degree to which the firm's existing financial, operational, supervisory, and compliance systems can accommodate the proposed new business line.

Based upon these factors, we believe that at least some proposed expansions by member firms into new areas of business would not constitute a material change and thus not trigger a review under amended Rule 1017. Certain proposed new business lines, such as market making, underwriting, and acting as a dealer for the first time, will invariably constitute a material change in business operations.

Interpretive Material 1011-1 (IM-1011-1)

IM-1011-1 is added to create a safe harbor for certain changes that are presumed not to be a "material change in business operations," and therefore do not require a member to submit an application pursuant to amended Rule 1017 for approval of the change. The safe harbor was created out of the recognition that firms need to be able to grow while essential investor protections are maintained.

The safe harbor is intended to balance these needs while allowing firms to file and NASD Regulation staff to review those proposed business expansions that are most likely to affect the financial, compliance, and/or internal control systems of firms. Firms with certain membership agreement restrictions or a disciplinary history would not be able to use the safe harbor.

The safe harbor is available to those firms that do not have a membership agreement and to those firms that have a membership agreement but the agreement does not contain a restriction on thepermissible expansion areas of the safe harbor (number of associated persons involved in sales, number of offices, and number of markets made). The safe harbor is not available to a firm that has a specific restriction in its membership agreement on any one of those three areas of expansion. Similarly, if a firm has a membership agreement that already permits greater expansion levels than permitted by the safe harbor, then membership agreement levels take precedence over the safe harbor levels. In both of these situations, NASD Regulation staff have already evaluated a firm's systems and procedures and the staff have incorporated the restrictions or expansion plans into the membership agreement.

If a proposed expansion is outside of the safe harbor provisions, it does not necessarily mean that the expansion is a "material change in business operations." The safe harbor provisions are meant to provide guidance on what changes will not be considered material. Whether changes and expansions outside of the safe harbor provisions are material will need to be determined on a case-by-case NASD Notice to Members 00-73 October 2000 570 NASD Notice to Members 00-73 basis by reviewing the particular facts and circumstances. A member may, but is not required to, contact its District Office to obtain guidance on this issue.

In addition, the safe harbor would not be available to members that have a defined "disciplinary history."⁸ A member with a disciplinary history as defined by IM-1011-1 does not necessarily need to apply under amended Rule 1017 for every business expansion. Again, whether changes and expansions to be undertaken by a firm with "disciplinary history" are material would be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Rule 1012 - Filing By Applicant Or Service By The Association

NASD Regulation has amended the service and filing provisions to permit additional methods of delivery and to use consistent terminology for calculating deadlines. The term "commercial courier" is replaced with "overnight courier" to clarify that applicants and NASD Regulation staff may use the overnight delivery service offered by the United States PostalService. NASD Regulation interprets the term "overnight courier" to refer to any entity that regularly provides overnight delivery services, such as Federal Express, DHL, or the United States Postal Service. Use of the term "overnight courier" is not intended to imply that only actual overnight delivery may be used under the Rule. Overnight delivery should be used if it is available. However, if overnight delivery is not available for a particular location, the applicant or NASD Regulation staff may use the most rapid delivery option available (e.g., two-day service) from the overnight courier and still be in compliance with the Rule.

Throughout the amended Rules, the term "file" is used uniformly to refer to submissions by an applicant, and the term "serve" is used uniformly to refer to delivery of requests, decisions, and the like by the Association. These terms replace other terms, such as "issuance" and "receipt."⁹ These changes provide greater clarity and consistency in calculating deadlines in accordance with amended Rule 1012(a).

"Lapse Of Application"Provisions

The "lapse of application" provisions are consolidated and moved from existing Rules 1013(b), 1017(c), and 1018(d) to amended Rule 1012(b) for ease of reference. The lapse rule permits the staff to discontinue processing an application if an applicant does not timely provide requested information or documents. If the information or documents are not timely provided, then the rule permits the staff to "lapse" the application. The staff then notifies the applicant that the application has lapsed, all fees are forfeited, and the applicant is required to start over with the application process if it still wants to pursue the application.

The changes to the lapse rule also are designed to permit the staff and the applicant to agree on a submission date for the executed membership agreement, ratherthan requiring that all signed agreements be submitted within 25 days. In addition, the changes clarify that application fees are notrefunded for lapsed applications.

Rule 1013 - New Member Application And Interview

Application Submission Procedures

One of the major changes to amended Rule 1013 is to simplify the application submission procedures. Currently, Rule 1013 requires applicants to submit their applications in two parts. Part One, which includes primarily forms and fees (e.g., the initial Forms BD and U-4), is sent directly to the CRD in Rockville, Maryland, for processing. Part Two, which includes all remaining documents required for member admission, is sent to the District Office that will review the application. At the time the Rule was initially adopted, the staff thought it would be more efficient to send each part to the location where it would be processed. In practice, this has created problems when both parts of the application are not submitted at the same time, or one or both parts are incomplete, making it difficult to determine when the application should be treated as filed. Determining the application filing date is critical in order to meet the requirement that a decision on the application be rendered within 180 days.

To alleviate this problem, Rule 1013 has been amended to create one point of entry for the entire application, the District Office.

Procedures For Applications That Are Not Substantially Complete

NASD Regulation has added subparagraph (a)(4) to amended Rule 1013 for handling applications that are not substantially complete at the time of submission.Currently, the staff does not have any express authority in the existing rule to refuse to begin processing NASD Notice to Members 00-73 October 2000571 NASD Notice to Members 00-73 an incomplete application. Instead, NASD Regulation staff attempts tobegin processing such an application by sending a request forfurther information to the applicant.

Under the amended rule, if an application is so deficient upon initial submission that the staff cannot begin conducting a meaningful review, then the staff may reject the application and deem it to not have been filed. The staff must make this determination within 30 days after submission, and is required to provide reasons for its action in writing. NASD Regulation will assess a $350 processing fee for the rejection of an application that is not substantially complete. NASD Regulation considered but rejected defining the term "substantially complete" because the determination will vary depending on, among other things, the type and complexity of the proposed business.

Amended Rule 1013 also is simplified for applicants by removing requirements that they submit information that has already been provided to CRD becauseDistrict Office staff has full access to CRD. This change will make the application process simpler for applicants by eliminating duplicate submissions.

Initial And Subsequent Document Filings

Under Rule 1013(a)(2), an applicant will continue to submit only its initial Forms BD and U-4 in paper along with the rest of the application. Under amended Rule 1013(a)(3), the applicant must make all subsequent Form filings and amendments electronically via Web CRD^SM. Prior to making electronic filings, an applicant must seek and receive approval of the Web CRD entitlement request form by NASD Regulation. This process is in conformity with SEC requirements for the submission of Form BD and amendments to it.¹⁰ Conforming amendments have been made to Rule 1140.

New Membership Application Requirements

Adequacy of Communication and Operational Systems

New subparagraph (a)(2)(F)(xii) of amended Rule 1013 adds a new requirement for applicants to provide a description of the communications and operational systems that they will use to conduct business as well as plans and procedures they will employ to ensure business continuity. Included with the documentation should be information about the capacity to handle anticipated usage, contingency plans, and disaster recovery plans, among other things. In addition, this requirement has been formulated into a new standard for membership admission and has been added to requirements contained in Rule 1014. This new standard in amended Rule 1014 requires that such systems are adequate and provide reasonably for the business' continuity for each area set forth in amended Rule 1013(a)(2)(F)(xii).

It is not the staff's intention to investigate the adequacy of the systems, plans, and procedures; rather applicants, in order to demonstrate that their systems are adequate and will reasonably provide for business continuity, must file a certification as part of their application. The applicant may self-certify or may choose to rely on a third party (e.g., a vendor of such a system) to provide such certification. ¹¹

Updated Financial Information

Rule 1013 is amended by adding new subparagraph (b)(5) to require applicants to provide updated financial information at the time of their membership interview. The updated information shall be prepared as of a date that is within 45 days before the interview.

Rule 1014 - Department Decision

Standards For Admission

As described above, Rule 1013 has been amended to require that the applicant submit a description of the communications and operational systems that the applicant will employ to conduct business and the plan and procedures to ensure business continuity. The amended Rule 1014 requires that such systems must be adequate and reasonably provide for business continuity before an application is approved.

In addition, Rule 1014 is amended to require that an applicant's supervisory procedures must specifically include procedures to ensure that proper registrations for principals and representatives are obtained by the firm.

The Committee and NASD Regulation also reevaluated the requirement of current Rule 1014(a)(9)(C) (amended Rule 1014(a)(10)(D)) that prospective supervisors have at least one year of direct experience or at least two years of related experience in the subject area to be supervised. It was determined that the supervisory experience requirements should not be increased at this time. Interpretive guidance on this matter has been published in How To Become A Member Of The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., which is available in the area for members on the NASD Regulation Web Site (www.nasdr.com).

Submission Of Membership Agreements

Rule 1014(c), which concerns the submission of membership agreements, is amended by deleting the requirement in subsection (c)(1) that all membership agreements contain an undertaking binding the member to "engage only in the business set forth in the business plan and the membership agreement." NASD Regulation believes that the current rule was too restrictive, particularly for firms with no disciplinary history. The provision also puts members with a membership agreement at a disadvantage to members that do not have a membership agreement.¹² Henceforth, whether business expansions require approval by NASD Regulation will be governed solely by the requirements of amended Rule 1017.

When the amended Rules become effective, to ensure that members are treated equally, NASD Regulation will permit members that are eligible for the safe harbor to use it even if their membership agreement includes a general requirement to obtain approval from NASD Regulation of any change in business outside the terms of the agreement. When NASD Regulation examines a member, the membership agreement will be updated to reflect the new Rule.

In addition, when the Rule amendments become effective, NASD Regulation will begin, to the extent practicable, including business expansion plans in membership agreements. Members that have not been through the membership review process or examined under the Rules adopted by the Association in August of 1997 and have existing restrictions in membership agreements, may want to contact their District Office to see if it would be appropriate to have the restriction removed.

Rule 1015 - Review By National Adjudicatory Council

Under Rule 1015, an applicant can appeal an adverse District Office decision to the NAC. In addition, the NAC or the NAC Review Subcommittee may call for review a District Office decision on a membership application, even though no appeal has been filed by an applicant. NASD Regulation considered at length whether procedures or policies could effectively be developed to implement the call for review provision when no appeal was taken, but ultimately determined that developing such procedures and policies was not practicable.

NASD Regulation believes that the oversight function envisioned for the call for review provision is effectively performed through a variety of other existing mechanisms. The Department of Member Regulation (Department) employs a full time Membership Manager to coordinate and oversee the national program. Included in the Manager's responsibilities is a quality control function. This function is carried out in several ways: maintenance of a Membership Procedures Manual; periodic advice memoranda sent to District Office staff (MAP Bulletins); regularly scheduled telephone conferences with District Office staff to discuss procedural and substantive issues arising in the program; and periodic training sessions for new and incumbent staff.

To supplement these tools, the Department's Office of Quality Assurance conducts periodic peer reviews of the membership application program. The purpose of these peer reviews is to assess the District Offices' application of the membership rules andprocedures. The reviews include, among other things, spot checks of source documents to confirm the facts underlying the decisions.

In light of NASD Regulation's national coordination and internal review procedures, Rule 1015 has been amended to delete the provision whereby the NAC or theNAC Review Subcommittee maycall for review of a decision on a membership application made by the Department staff, even if theapplicant does not appeal the decision.¹³

Rule 1015 has been amended to include a new paragraph (h) for dismissing appeals that are abandoned by an applicant, which includes, among other things, failing to appear at a hearing as set forth in current Rule 1015(f)(5), among other things.

Rule 1016 - Discretionary Review by NASD Board

Conforming amendments are being made to Rule 1016.

Rule 1017 - Application For Approval Of Change In Ownership, Control, Or Business Operations

Current Rule 1017, "Removal or Modification of Business Restriction," and Rule 1018, "Change in Ownership, Control or Operations," are consolidated in the amended Rule 1017. This change is being made to assist firms in filing and NASD Regulation staff in reviewing applications for a change in firm ownership or control, or for a material change in the firm's business operations. Currently, a member may initiate business changes that involve both Rule 1017 and Rule 1018. This hascreated some confusion as to which rule should be used. Byconsolidating these rules, NASD Regulation anticipates making the process more efficient and effective for applicants and thus eliminating any confusion that may arise from the previously overlapping provisions. The consolidation of the two rules is achieved in part by defining, for the first time, the term "material change in business operations," in amended Rule 1011(i) to include certain types ofbusiness expansions as well as the removal or modification of a membership agreement restriction.

Amended Rule 1017 also sets forth additional documentation requirements for the review of an application (detailed below).

As provided in current Rules 1017 and 1018, an application and its accompanying documents need to be filed with the member's District Office. In the event of a merger between two members with principal places of business in two or more districts, the application must be filed and processed by the District Office where the surviving firm's principal place of business is located.

Change In Ownership Or Control

One type of change that triggers an application under amended Rule 1017 is a change in the equity ownership or partnership capital of the member that results in one person or entity owning or controlling 25 percent or more of the equity or partnership capital. NASD Regulation wishes to clarify that a group of individuals acting in concert to obtain control of 25 percent or more of the equity or partnership capital of a member willbe deemed to be an "entity" for purposes of the Rule, and as such, will trigger the requirement to submit an application to obtainapproval of the ownership change.

In addition, NASD Regulation will discontinue its review of certain other types of changes. Under amended Rule 1017, NASD Regulation will discontinue review of member mergers and acquisitions that are reviewed by the New York Stock Exchange. This will eliminate duplicate reviews by self-regulatory organizations.

Filing And Content Of Application Requirements

Amended Rule 1017(b) sets forth for the first time what type of information should be included in an application for approval of a change in ownership, control, or business operations.

Paragraph (b) of amended Rule 1017 contains the initial content requirements and specifies where the application should be filed. Generally, this paragraph incorporates NASD Regulation's standard practices under current Rules 1017 and 1018. However, subparagraph (b)(2), for the first time, identifies items that must be included with an application. Specifically, the items include details on the change in ownership, control or business operations, including a business plan, pro forma financial statements, an organizational chart, and written supervisory procedures that reflect the change.

For applications requesting removal or modification of a membership agreement restriction, the content requirements of current Rule 1017(a) are carried forward in the amended rule and will, therefore, still apply. In addition, the new documentation requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of amended Rule 1017 (detailed in the above paragraph) must be supplied with an application.

Effecting Change And Imposition Of Interim Restrictions

In addition, amended Rule 1017(c) sets forth the timing and conditions for effecting a change under amended Rule 1017. For a member that is filing an application for approval of a change in ownership or control, amended Rule 1017(c)(1) states that the application shall be filed at least 30 days before the event. A member may effect a change prior to the conclusion of NASD Regulation's review of the application or issuance of the Department's decision on the application;however, NASD Regulation mayplace new interim restrictions on the member based upon the standards contained in Rule 1014pending final action.

For a member that is filing an application for the removal or modification of a restriction contained in a membership agreement, amended Rule 1017(c)(2) states that the change may not be effected until NASD Regulation has reached a decision. Until a decision has been reached, all existing restrictions must remain in place.

For a member's application seeking approval of a material change in business operations (other than for the removal or modification of a membership agreement restriction), the change will be effective upon the Department's decision approving the application. In addition, Rule 1017(c)(3) does allow the member to effect the change prior to NASD Regulation's decision, but only with prior agreement of the Department.

Lapse Or Denial Of Application For Approval Of Change In Ownership

NASD Regulation is adopting a new paragraph (k) to Rule 1017 to clarify the courses of action when an application for approval of a change in ownership lapses or is denied and all appeals are exhausted or waived. The rule change provides the member with a fixed period of time, 60 days, to submit a new application, ¹⁴ unwind the transaction, or file a Form BDW.

The Department may shorten the 60-day period for the protection of investors. In addition, the Department may lengthen the 60- day period upon good cause shown by the applicant. The Department may continue to place interim restrictions on the member during the 60-day (or extended) period. The purpose of the rule change is to clarify NASD Regulation's procedures and to ensure that proper investor protections are maintained. If a member operates outside or beyond the specified time period, then NASD Regulation may bring an action and/or seek the suspension or cancellation of the membership, as appropriate.

Rule 1018 - Reserved

NASD Regulation has deleted the provisions contained in Rule 1018 and reserves this Rule number for future use.

Rule 1140 - Electronic Filing Rules

Conforming amendments are being made to Rule 1140 to clarify that the initial filing of Forms under amended Rule 1013(a)(2) must be filed in paper form. All subsequent filings must be filed through an electronic process.

Additional Guidance

Revisions also will be made to the reference documents, How To Become A Member Of The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and A Guide to Areas of Inquiry in Continuing Membership Applications and Applications to Remove or Modify Restrictions in order to conform them to the amended rules. Both revised documents will be found on the NASD Regulation Web Site www.nasdr.com) after November 15, 2000.

Endnotes

¹ Members of the Committee were: Faith Colish, New York, New York; Linda Lerner, All-Tech Investment Group, Inc., Montvale, New Jersey; Brian T. Shea, Pershing, Division of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corporation, Jersey City, New Jersey; Theodore W. Urban, Ferris, Baker & Watts, Incorporated, Washington, D.C.; and Richard P. Woltman, Spelman & Co., Inc., San Diego, California. Mr. Urban chaired the Committee.

² Exchange Act Release No. 42885 (June 1, 2000), 65 Fed. Reg. 36860 (June 12, 2000), (File No. SR-NASD-99-67).

³ Exchange Act Release No. 43157 (August 15, 2000), 65 Fed. Reg. 51377 (August 23, 2000).

⁴ NASD Regulation has not made any changes to the definition of "sales practice violation" on the Form U-4.

⁵ NASD Regulation included removing or modifying a restriction in this definition to facilitate the consolidation of current Rules 1017 and 1018. The rationale for the consolidation is set forth in the section titled "Rule 1017," below.

⁶ Efforts were made during the Committee's deliberations to devise a comprehensive definition of "material change in business operations" that would provide members with greater certainty about when an application is required while affording staff the opportunity to review those proposed business expansions that were most likely to affect the financial, compliance, and/or internal control systems of the firm. After much thought and discussion, Committee members and NASD Regulation staff concluded that it was preferable not to develop a comprehensive definition of the term. Instead, the Committee recommended, and the amended rules provide, two measures designed to add greater clarity to the process and still preserve flexibility in applying the rule to individual situations: the adoption of IM-1011-1 to create a safe harbor for certain changes that are presumed not to be material and therefore do not require a member to submit an application; and the adoption of a nonexhaustive definition of "material change in business operations" that would alert members to some of the types of business expansions that can be expected to trigger the need to file an application.

⁷ NASD Regulation staff tailors the scope of its review of proposed business expansions to the particular circumstances presented. In some cases, for example, when a firm seeks to expand into an area in which it already has relevant experience and comprehensive supervisory and internal controls, NASD Regulation's review would be more limited. In other cases, when a firm seeks to add a completely new business line unrelated to its current business mix, the scope of review could be more extensive.

⁸ "Disciplinary history" means a finding of a violation by the member or a principal of the member in the past five years by the SEC, a self-regulatory organization, or a foreign financial regulatory authority of one or more of the following provisions (or comparable foreign provisions) or rules or regulations thereunder:

Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (failure to supervise; fraud and NASD Notice to Members 00-73 October 2000 575 NASD Notice to Members 00-73 manipulation); Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (fraudulent interstate transactions); SEC Rules 10b-5 (fraud and manipulation), and 15g-1 through 15g-9 (penny stock rules); NASD Rules 2110 (just and equitable principles of trade), 2120(fraud and manipulation), 2310 (suitability), 2330 (protection of customer securities and funds), 2440 (fair prices and commissions), 3010 (failure to supervise only), 3310 (manipulative and deceptive quotations), and 3330 (payments to influence market prices); and MSRB Rules G-19 (suitability), G-30 (prices and commissions), and G-37(b) & (c) (political contributions).

⁹See, e.g., Rule 1013(a)(5) and (b)(1), Rule 1014(c)(3).

¹⁰See Exchange Act Release No. 41594 (Jul. 2, 1999), 64 Fed. Reg. 37586 (Jul. 12, 1999).

¹¹See Exchange Act Release No. 42885 (June 1, 2000), 65 Fed. Reg. 36860 (June 12, 2000) at page 36874.

¹² In 1984, the SEC approved a codification of the NASD's member admission procedures, which included a requirement that any restriction on a member's business be included in a membership agreement executed by the member. See Exchange Act Release No. 21159, 49 Fed. Reg. 30268 (Jul. 27, 1984) (File No. SR-NASD-82-24). Thus, a member admitted before 1984 or a member admitted without any restriction from 1984 to 1997 may not have a membership agreement. In 1997, NASD Regulation began requiring all new members to execute a membership agreement, regardless of whether NASD Regulation imposed any restriction. See NASD Rule 1014(c); Exchange Act Release No. 38908 (Aug. 7, 1997); 62 Fed. Reg. 43385 (Aug. 13, 1997) (File No. SR-NASD-97-28).

¹³ Until these rule amendments go into effect, NASD Regulation has temporarily suspended calls for review of membership decisions and proposes to delete this provision. See Exchange Act Release No. 41311 (Apr. 20, 1999), 64 Fed. Reg. 20347 (Apr. 26, 1999) (File SR-NASD-99-15), for further explanation of this decision.

¹⁴ A lapsed applicant may propose the same owners; a denied applicant must propose new owners.

ATTACHMENT A

(Note: New text is underlined; deletions are in brackets.)

1010. Membership Proceedings

1011. Definitions

IM-1011-1. Safe Harbors for Business Expansions

This interpretive material concerns the types of business expansions that will not require a member to submit a Rule 1017 application to obtain NASD Regulation's approval of the expansion. This safe harbor applies to: (1) firms that do not have a membership agreement, and (2) firms that have a membership agreement that does not contain a restriction on the factors listed below.

The safe harbor is not available to a member that has a membership agreement that contains a specific restriction as to one or more of the factors listed below. In that case, the agreement takes precedence because NASD Regulation has determined that a particular restriction should apply as to one or more of the factors, and NASD Regulation has issued a decision with a rationale for that restriction. Similarly, the safe harbor also does notapply if the member has a membership agreement that permits expansion beyond the limits set forthbelow (e.g., an Applicant requests and obtains approval for ten registered representatives in the first six months with an additional ten registered representatives in the nextyear); in such case, the Department has specifically considered the firm's expansion plans and approved them.

The safe harbor is not available to any member that has disciplinary history. For purposes of this Interpretation, "disciplinary history" means a finding of a violation by the member or a principal of the member in the past five years by the Securities and Exchange Commission, a self-regulatory organization, or a foreign financial regulatory authority of one or more of the following provisions (or a comparable foreign provision) or rules or regulations thereunder: Sections 15(b)(4)(E) and 15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; SEC Rules 10b-5 and 15g-1 through 15g-9; NASD Rules 2110, 2120, 2310, 2330, 2440, 3010 (failure to supervise only), 3310, and 3330; and MSRB Rules G-19, G- 30, and G-37(b) & (c).

For those firms to which the safe harbor is available, the following types of expansions are presumed not to be a material change in business operations and therefore do not require a Rule 1017 application. For any expansion beyond these limits, a member should contact its district office prior to implementing the change to determine whether the proposed expansion requires an application under Rule 1017. Expansions in each area are measured on a rolling 12-month basis; members are required to keep records of increases in personnel, offices, and markets to determine whether they are within the safe harbor.

"Associated Persons involved in sales" includes all Associated Persons, whether or not registered, who are involved in sales activities with public customers, including sales assistants and cold callers, but excludes clerical, back office, and trading personnel who are not involved in sales activities.

1012. General Provisions

1013.New Member Application [and Membership] and Interview

1014. Department Decision

1015. Review by National Adjudicatory Council

1016. Discretionary Review byNASD Board

1017. [Removal or Modification of Business Restriction] Application for Approval of Change in Ownership, Control, or Business Operations

[1018. Change in Ownership, Control, or Operations]

1018. Reserved

1019. Application to Commission for Review

No change.

Rule 1140. Electronic Filing Rules