Adjudications & Decisions
When FINRA determines that violations of securities rules have occurred and formal disciplinary action is necessary, the Enforcement Department files a complaint with the Office of Hearing Officers (OHO).
The Office arranges a three-person panel to hear the case. The panel is chaired by a hearing officer who is an employee of the Office of Hearing Officers. The Chief Hearing Officer appoints two industry panelists, drawn primarily from a pool of current and former securities industry members of FINRA's District Committees, as well as its Market Regulation Committee, former members of FINRA's National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) and former FINRA Governors.
At the hearing, the parties present evidence for the panel to determine whether a firm or individual has engaged in conduct that violates FINRA rules, SEC regulations or federal securities laws. In reaching its decision, the hearing panel also considers previous court, SEC, and NAC decisions to determine if violations occurred. The NAC is the national committee which reviews initial decisions rendered in FINRA disciplinary and membership proceedings.
For each case, the hearing panel will issue a written decision explaining the reasons for its ruling and consult the FINRA Sanction Guidelines to determine the appropriate sanctions if violations have occurred. FINRA also, when feasible and appropriate, can order firms and individuals to make restitution to harmed customers.
Appeals Process
Under FINRA's disciplinary procedures, a firm or individual has the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC, or the NAC may on its own initiate a review of a decision. On appeal, the NAC will determine if a hearing panel's findings were legally correct, factually supported and consistent with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines. While a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction is not enforced against the firm or individual.
Unless FINRA's Board of Governors decides to review the NAC's appellate decision, that decision represents FINRA's final action. A firm or individual can appeal FINRA's decision to the SEC and then to federal court.
View All Adjudications & Decisions
Date of Decision | Proceeding No. | Title | Type |
---|---|---|---|
January 01, 2008 | SD08004 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Denials |
January 01, 2008 | SD08005 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Approvals |
January 01, 2008 | SD08007 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Denials |
January 01, 2008 | SD08001 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Approvals |
January 01, 2008 | SD08006 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Approvals |
January 01, 2008 | SD08003 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Denials |
January 01, 2008 | SD08002 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Approvals |
January 01, 2008 | SD08008 | In the Matter of the Association of X | Redacted Decision, Statutory Disqualification, Approvals |
December 27, 2007 | E8A2004095901 | Jason A. Craig | Disciplinary Decision |
December 20, 2007 | C9B040098 | Scott Epstein | Disciplinary Decision |
December 19, 2007 | C10040052 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Scott Mathis | Disciplinary Decision |
December 14, 2007 | C05050015 | Kevin P. Calandro and James W. Browne | Disciplinary Decision |
December 11, 2007 | 20050000720-02 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Respondent | Redacted Decision |
December 07, 2007 | ARB070050 | Order Deeming Request for Hearing Abandoned and Terminating Expedited Proceeding and Notice that Respondent's Suspension Is in Effect | Expedited Order |
December 06, 2007 | 20070086505-01 | Order to Show Cause | Disciplinary Order |
December 04, 2007 | C05020055 | Michael F. Siegel | Disciplinary Decision |
November 30, 2007 | E8A2005014902 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. North Woodward Financial Corp. and Douglas A. Troszak | Disciplinary Decision |
November 28, 2007 | EAF0400300001 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Kirlin Securities, Inc., Anthony J. Kirincic, David O. Lindner and Andrew J. Israel | Disciplinary Decision |
November 26, 2007 | 2005000323905 | Order Denying Motion (1) to Reassign, (2) for Additional Information Regarding Panelists, (3) to Permit Discovery and (4) for a Delay in the Hearing | Disciplinary Order |
November 16, 2007 | E102004083703 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Harvey M. Schwartz | Disciplinary Decision |
November 06, 2007 | 2006005936701 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. William D. Mattes, Sr. | Disciplinary Decision |
November 06, 2007 | 2006004494201 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Todd William Cowle | Disciplinary Decision |
November 01, 2007 | ELI2004026701 | Hearing Panel Decision in Department of Enforcement v. Iftikhar Ul Haq | Disciplinary Decision |
October 31, 2007 | 20070077587 | Order Resolving Certain Pre-Hearing Motions | Disciplinary Order |
October 18, 2007 | C10030095 | John Audifferen | Disciplinary Decision |